Ruger Mk IV vs. earlier Mk.
+3
LenV
Jon Eulette
Psween
7 posters
Page 1 of 1
Ruger Mk IV vs. earlier Mk.
I shoot and like a Mk. II Govt. Target, with the 6 7/8" bull barrel. Trigger is good, accuracy is easily X ring with several different ammos, and it is utterly reliable with just about any ammo. I have it set up with a dot and ergo grips, but I am finding that I just don't like how muzzle heavy it is. Local GS has a Mk. IV 22/45 with 5 1/2" bull but not sure if the accuracy or trigger are likely as good. Any firsthand accounts of differences between the older and newest Ruger. 22s? Thanks!
Psween- Posts : 57
Join date : 2020-07-17
Re: Ruger Mk IV vs. earlier Mk.
Have your gov't barrel cut down. I did that to mine. Loved it afterwards.
Jon
Jon
Jon Eulette- Posts : 4399
Join date : 2013-04-15
Location : Southern Kalifornia
Dan Webb likes this post
Re: Ruger Mk IV vs. earlier Mk.
If you like the barrel length that you have, you can have the sides of the barrel cut down to make it a "slab side" or if you want it shorter, do like Jon suggests and have someone cut the barrel off and crown it.
BE Mike- Posts : 2589
Join date : 2011-07-29
Location : Indiana
Re: Ruger Mk IV vs. earlier Mk.
Thanks all, although I'm not a collector I'd still like to keep this Mk. II stock (it's been drilled and tapped for a rail so it's not purely stock anyway), so the 22/45 (or other) would be a new gun to try. Justhaven't had a chance to check trigger and accuracy of the newer guns.
Psween- Posts : 57
Join date : 2020-07-17
Re: Ruger Mk IV vs. earlier Mk.
Jon Eulette wrote:Have your gov't barrel cut down. I did that to mine. Loved it afterwards.
Jon
My older arms find my pistols heavier than they used to be. I picked up a 4" bbl Buckmark for 50ft indoor league. I like that barrel length but the trigger sucks. Seems to be a lack of smiths focusing on the Buckmark. I'm tempted to have a 4" barrel made for my HS Victor (not going to alter the original).
hg401- Posts : 128
Join date : 2018-02-19
Re: Ruger Mk IV vs. earlier Mk.
I can’t speak to new vs old, but if you are really happy with the pistol, you could try to find a 5.5 upper. Should be cheaper than a new Mk IV and you’ll have the same feel. And if you ever decide to sell it, you’re not selling a cut down barrel. Then again, cutting the barrel or milling the sides may be the least cost.
RodJ- Posts : 928
Join date : 2021-06-26
Location : TX
Re: Ruger Mk IV vs. earlier Mk.
I don't believe the MkIV upper will fit on previous models since the takedown is different. Also, IDK about the MkIV uppers, but earlier models the upper is the serialized part...
Motophotog7- Posts : 136
Join date : 2020-01-04
Location : Clifton Park, NY
Similar topics
» Adjustable trigger weight when using a .22 conversion on your .45 1911
» Were S&W 14-5/6 Full Lug as accurate as earlier 14's.
» Show Me Your Bullseye Pistols
» Rink Grips for the RUGER MARK IV, RUGER MARK IV
» Ruger GP 100 for BE?
» Were S&W 14-5/6 Full Lug as accurate as earlier 14's.
» Show Me Your Bullseye Pistols
» Rink Grips for the RUGER MARK IV, RUGER MARK IV
» Ruger GP 100 for BE?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum