Bullseye-L Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

New Accuracy Standard Proposal

+3
Wobbley
lablover
fc60
7 posters

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by fc60 Thu Feb 27, 2020 8:40 pm

Greetings,

A good day testing today. Sunny, warm and no wind.

I fired five (5) twenty shot groups (I cleaned the barrel after each string and fired five fouling shots.) testing different powder weights. No documented load data, so do not ask what powder.

I used a custom barrel chambered for, cough-cough, 32 ACP mounted in a mechanical fixture.

Distance was 50 yards.

Test bullet was one of my creations. A 65 grain HBSWC swaged from 25:1 alloy (Lead:Tin)

All five groups individually scored 200x19, so no real winners.

If I moved the overlay around several groups would have scored 200x20; but, that's cheating. Basically, each group had one flyer.

Average Velocities ranged from 775.6 to 911.2 FPS

Below is the backing paper from all the testing. 125 Shots in all !!!

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Gsp32a10

Pour me another glass of KoolAid, please....

Cheers,

Dave
fc60
fc60

Posts : 1458
Join date : 2011-06-11
Location : South Prairie, WA 98385

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by lablover Thu Feb 27, 2020 8:44 pm

Take my money!
lablover
lablover

Posts : 1275
Join date : 2015-07-30
Location : Michigan

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by Wobbley Thu Feb 27, 2020 9:18 pm

That bullet looks like a winner.  Maybe shop it around to these lower volume stagers for copying?
Wobbley
Wobbley
Admin

Posts : 4805
Join date : 2015-02-13

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by lablover Thu Feb 27, 2020 9:27 pm

Wobbley wrote:That bullet looks like a winner.  Maybe shop it around to these lower volume stagers for copying?
I would love to see it and how it was made.  Dies? I’m sure you made them yourself.
lablover
lablover

Posts : 1275
Join date : 2015-07-30
Location : Michigan

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by james r chapman Thu Feb 27, 2020 9:33 pm

The Harry Pope of .32 pistols 🤠
james r chapman
james r chapman
Admin

Posts : 6372
Join date : 2012-01-31
Age : 75
Location : HELL, Michigan

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by S148 Fri Feb 28, 2020 4:56 am

I, too, would love to see a picture of the bullet and the look of the loaded round.  Thanks in advance.

S148

Posts : 319
Join date : 2017-07-04

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by Outthere Fri Feb 28, 2020 10:07 am

If you get a chance, pick up a copy of, "Experiments of a Handgunner" by Walter Roper. Brilliant man, way ahead of his time.

Some very interesting tests shot at 50 yards.
Outthere
Outthere

Posts : 306
Join date : 2013-03-20

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by lablover Fri Feb 28, 2020 10:14 am

I’m too chicken to experiment with loads that are not well tested.  However, when I see stuff from Dave I’m all ears and eyes!  I understand him not posting the load data.  Better safe than sorry in today’s world.

I am very curious on this swaged bullet...I see a bullet Swage in my future as other local shooters as well are.
lablover
lablover

Posts : 1275
Join date : 2015-07-30
Location : Michigan

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by James Hensler Fri Feb 28, 2020 10:54 am

Dave this is a barrel mounted to the rest right? Not a pistol?
James Hensler
James Hensler

Posts : 1245
Join date : 2018-01-15
Age : 55
Location : Southwest Florida

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by lablover Fri Feb 28, 2020 10:59 am

I used a custom barrel chambered for, cough-cough, 32 ACP mounted in a mechanical fixture.

Leads me to believe it’s in a barrel in his fixture...now we need the barrel. lol!
lablover
lablover

Posts : 1275
Join date : 2015-07-30
Location : Michigan

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by James Hensler Fri Feb 28, 2020 12:41 pm

Yeah I think so and yes it would be nice to get a barrel like this! 
Onetime I was watching John Sue use a barrel fixture to find a barrel for his personal wad gun! He tried at least 10 different ones before deciding on one the keyholes 10 shots! I mean it was 1 small damn hole!
James Hensler
James Hensler

Posts : 1245
Join date : 2018-01-15
Age : 55
Location : Southwest Florida

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by fc60 Fri Feb 28, 2020 2:39 pm

Greetings,

The barrel is a mystery.

I bought it advertised as a Krieger. Telephoning Krieger, they said they never heard of it.

What I do know is this...

1:13 twist
0.312" groove diameter
0.300" bore diameter
Stainless Steel
32 HRC
Eight lands and grooves

I chambered it to headspace on the rim, not the case mouth.

The pistol it is destined for is a Walther GSP-C Expert with a modified bolt.

Still a lot of work to complete.

So far, it looks promising.

Cheers,

Dave
fc60
fc60

Posts : 1458
Join date : 2011-06-11
Location : South Prairie, WA 98385

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by James Hensler Wed Mar 04, 2020 2:45 pm

New Accuracy Standard Proposal 2865ed10
New Accuracy Standard Proposal C7a55c10
New Accuracy Standard Proposal Fc10db10Here is my groups!
They are shot from a Pistol on a makeshift rest!
Didn’t have 125 rounds to pop off but I think you guys can get the picture
James Hensler
James Hensler

Posts : 1245
Join date : 2018-01-15
Age : 55
Location : Southwest Florida

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by fc60 Wed Mar 04, 2020 5:19 pm

Greetings,

Groups are okay.

However, load data helps a lot.

Nice sunny day out, where's the chronograph?

Cheers,

Dave
fc60
fc60

Posts : 1458
Join date : 2011-06-11
Location : South Prairie, WA 98385

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by James Hensler Wed Mar 04, 2020 5:40 pm

New Accuracy Standard Proposal A2ad8210Ask and you shall receive 
2018 Pardini HP 
32 ACP
Hornady XTP 85 grain
1.6 grains of N310
Starline Brass
Federal primers
OAL .910
I am not happy with the chrono spread so I am going to add some crimp
Yeah the groups would look like yours if I put just the barrel in a Ransom Rest but I don’t have one so I just shot my 100% unaltered pistol!
James Hensler
James Hensler

Posts : 1245
Join date : 2018-01-15
Age : 55
Location : Southwest Florida

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by lablover Wed Mar 04, 2020 5:46 pm

Great info!  Thanks for sharing.  No TopSecret squirrel data!
lablover
lablover

Posts : 1275
Join date : 2015-07-30
Location : Michigan

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by fc60 Wed Mar 04, 2020 9:21 pm

Greetings,

Try Accurate #2 Powder.

At least they offer documented load data.

New Accuracy Standard Proposal 314_2025

Cheers,

Dave
fc60
fc60

Posts : 1458
Join date : 2011-06-11
Location : South Prairie, WA 98385

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by James Hensler Wed Mar 04, 2020 9:35 pm

Wow great group! Was this group shot in a pistol or just a barrel?
James Hensler
James Hensler

Posts : 1245
Join date : 2018-01-15
Age : 55
Location : Southwest Florida

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by fc60 Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:19 pm

Greetings,

The target was in my archives from when I was testing the Hornady 85 grain bullet.

I only have a Pardini barrel. I cannot afford all the rest of the bits to make it shoot out of hand.

So, yes, the barrel is mounted in a mechanical fixture.

I have conducted tests that demonstrate the accuracy is the same with the barrel tester and the barrel mounted in pistol with a 7x scope off sand bags.

Cheers,

Dave
fc60
fc60

Posts : 1458
Join date : 2011-06-11
Location : South Prairie, WA 98385

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by fc60 Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:28 pm

Greetings James,

What brand of chronograph are you using?

I do not have a SmartFone; but, the data formatting is good.

I am currently using a borrowed LabRadar to supplement my testing. Lots of data; however, I need to work on creating reports that I can link with my target scans.

Cheers,

Dave
fc60
fc60

Posts : 1458
Join date : 2011-06-11
Location : South Prairie, WA 98385

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by lablover Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:35 pm

Dave
Is that a stock Pardini barrel with the choke.   Also, your load shows higher than AA max.  Curious how you came to that.

Trying to stay safe

Thank you
lablover
lablover

Posts : 1275
Join date : 2015-07-30
Location : Michigan

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by James Hensler Thu Mar 05, 2020 11:17 am

I use a Caldwell chrono. I want a LabRadar
James Hensler
James Hensler

Posts : 1245
Join date : 2018-01-15
Age : 55
Location : Southwest Florida

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by fc60 Thu Mar 05, 2020 1:54 pm

lablover wrote:Dave
Is that a stock Pardini barrel with the choke.   Also, your load shows higher than AA max.  Curious how you came to that.

Trying to stay safe

Thank you
Greetings,

The Accurate test barrel is four inches long.

The Pardini is close to 5" long.

I attribute the increase in velocity to the increased barrel length.

My Pardini barrel does not have the choke applied.

Cheers,

Dave
fc60
fc60

Posts : 1458
Join date : 2011-06-11
Location : South Prairie, WA 98385

Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by Guest Thu Mar 05, 2020 2:56 pm

fc60 wrote:Greetings,

Try Accurate #2 Powder.

At least they offer documented load data.

New Accuracy Standard Proposal 314_2025

Cheers,

Dave
Dave,

Is that 1.75gr of Accurate #2 or 1.95gr - hard to judge from the image of the group.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by Guest Thu Mar 05, 2020 3:18 pm

Dave, sorry, I looked back through my notes and confirmed that you used 1.95gr. That jives with the WP Load Data book where they (conservatively) say 1.8gr Max for 695fps and 18,800psi.

So your 1.95gr is producing ~730fps and obviously remarkably consistent results. I recently bought some #2 and have some 85 XTP's - I will try it. I've now got a Star Universal which has been converted to 32ACP and intend to set that up for long line loads. Hope that I can achieve the same level of consistency.

Thanks.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

New Accuracy Standard Proposal Empty Re: New Accuracy Standard Proposal

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum