? Chrono Data N310 45 acp
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
? Chrono Data N310 45 acp
Here is data from a new ProChrono (which worked 100% reliably). There is some head scratching stuff here in the 200 gr LSWC from Missouri Bullet: why is .02 grains less of N310 with the same bullet generating over 100 FPS more velocity? OAL's are 1.255 on the 200 gr LSWC and 1.110 on the 185 gr lead bullets. Major difference is small primer used for 4.0 charge and large primer for 3.8 charge. I measured each OAL in the 3.8 charge but did not in the 4.0 charge pushing the 200gr LSWC. Opinions and thoughts?
chiltech500- Posts : 70
Join date : 2014-03-23
Location : N of Bethlehem PA
Re: ? Chrono Data N310 45 acp
I have never used N310, but I would discount the first column as a powder metering problem. Extreme spread is very high, even though average looks ok. Assuming this data was all taken with the same gun, the primer change (small to large) would seem to make the difference. The large primer is definitely a bigger bang and starts the burn more quickly/thoroughly. I even notice the difference between primer brands in some of my loads. For instance one load I use gives an occasional failure to lock open with WLP primers but almost never with CCI's. Primers do make a difference.
Dr.Don- Posts : 816
Join date : 2012-10-31
Location : Cedar Park, TX
Re: ? Chrono Data N310 45 acp
I believe the 1st 4 columns of my original post have errors that render those results null.
New Data that I have more confidence in and the 1st 2 columns of the second chart below it, I feel are reliable data.
" />
New Data that I have more confidence in and the 1st 2 columns of the second chart below it, I feel are reliable data.
" />
Last edited by chiltech500 on 4/24/2014, 4:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
chiltech500- Posts : 70
Join date : 2014-03-23
Location : N of Bethlehem PA
Re: ? Chrono Data N310 45 acp
Also I believe the 1st 2 columns of this chart are reliable a pertains to N310 4.0 gr. and may be compared to the N310 3.7 gr data posted above.
I do not have confidence in the 3.8 gr 200 LSWC data, believe my information on OAL or charge weights are wrong here.
" />
I do not have confidence in the 3.8 gr 200 LSWC data, believe my information on OAL or charge weights are wrong here.
" />
chiltech500- Posts : 70
Join date : 2014-03-23
Location : N of Bethlehem PA
Similar topics
» N310 load data
» VV N-310 & Nosler 185JHP--Chrono Speed?
» N310 Available
» 9mm Chrono Results for CFE, Titegroup & BE-86
» Bullseye Powder & the chrono
» VV N-310 & Nosler 185JHP--Chrono Speed?
» N310 Available
» 9mm Chrono Results for CFE, Titegroup & BE-86
» Bullseye Powder & the chrono
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|