The Updated Rules
+15
john bickar
Colt711
Astroimage2002
Jack H
Rob Kovach
C.Perkins
beeser
Brian Mason
gitkrunk
LenV
jmdavis
dronning
james r chapman
Jon Eulette
DeweyHales
19 posters
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
The Updated Rules
The updated rules.
DeweyHales- Posts : 641
Join date : 2011-06-10
Location : North Carolina
Re: The Updated Rules
Well for some reason I don't feel threatened by the NEW pistols allowed for EIC match :p).
Jon Eulette- Posts : 4399
Join date : 2013-04-15
Location : Southern Kalifornia
Re: The Updated Rules
looks like no 9mm 1911's....
james r chapman- Admin
- Posts : 6372
Join date : 2012-01-31
Age : 75
Location : HELL, Michigan
Re: The Updated Rules
DeweyHales wrote:The updated rules.
Thanks for the link
Oops misprint on cover. This is the 19th addition. The misprint says it supersedes the 19th addition - oops
- Dave
dronning- Posts : 2581
Join date : 2013-03-20
Age : 71
Location : Lakeville, MN
Re: The Updated Rules
Thanks Dewey!
Looks like what we mostly expected. I really wish that they would allow more than one military match for civillians though. Ah well.
Looks like what we mostly expected. I really wish that they would allow more than one military match for civillians though. Ah well.
jmdavis- Posts : 1409
Join date : 2012-03-23
Location : Virginia
Re: The Updated Rules
Thanks Dewey!
It answered 99% of the questions that have been circulating. I am left with only 2 questions after reading these new rules. 1. Is a SWC the same as a WC? I know the NRA allows SWC but not WC for DSR matches. 2. Is a metal jacketed bullet the same as a FMJ? I have noticed that some FMJ's really are not and have lead exposed on the base. I bring this up because of the HP questions. I am just throwing those questions out there with the hope someone has the answers.
Len
It answered 99% of the questions that have been circulating. I am left with only 2 questions after reading these new rules. 1. Is a SWC the same as a WC? I know the NRA allows SWC but not WC for DSR matches. 2. Is a metal jacketed bullet the same as a FMJ? I have noticed that some FMJ's really are not and have lead exposed on the base. I bring this up because of the HP questions. I am just throwing those questions out there with the hope someone has the answers.
Len
LenV- Posts : 4769
Join date : 2014-01-24
Age : 74
Location : Oregon
Re: The Updated Rules
Yeah. That surprised me a bit.james r chapman wrote:looks like no 9mm 1911's....
DeweyHales- Posts : 641
Join date : 2011-06-10
Location : North Carolina
Re: The Updated Rules
Jon Eulette wrote:Well for some reason I don't feel threatened by the NEW pistols allowed for EIC match :p).
I think there was one pistol on the list that would make me worry a little. The Browning Hi-power can be a tack driver and there are a lot of them out there. I think they could give a lot of the stuff on the line a run for it. Just my opinion of course.
Len
LenV- Posts : 4769
Join date : 2014-01-24
Age : 74
Location : Oregon
Re: The Updated Rules
yay my pardini qualifies for the 22 match
gitkrunk- Posts : 163
Join date : 2013-01-01
Age : 38
Location : Anchorage,AK
Re: The Updated Rules
For .22 pistol:
"Any system of recoil based on a compensator, barrel venting, barrel porting or other recoil reduction system operating in a similar manner is prohibited."
Does that mean the Pardini and Feinwerkbau are prohibited because they have recoil buffers?
"Any system of recoil based on a compensator, barrel venting, barrel porting or other recoil reduction system operating in a similar manner is prohibited."
Does that mean the Pardini and Feinwerkbau are prohibited because they have recoil buffers?
Brian Mason- Posts : 51
Join date : 2011-06-12
Location : CA
Re: The Updated Rules
Brian Mason wrote:For .22 pistol:
"Any system of recoil based on a compensator, barrel venting, barrel porting or other recoil reduction system operating in a similar manner is prohibited."
Does that mean the Pardini and Feinwerkbau are prohibited because they have recoil buffers?
"operating in a similar manner" to me based on their descriptions = gas operated recoil reduction of some kind. So if it doesn't use spent gasses I'd guess it's ok.
- Dave
dronning- Posts : 2581
Join date : 2013-03-20
Age : 71
Location : Lakeville, MN
Re: The Updated Rules
Reading it again, I think you're right. In any event, it seems weird that CMP would push to align this competition with International, then ban the Pardini, given how popular it is.dronning wrote:
"operating in a similar manner" to me based on their descriptions = gas operated recoil reduction of some kind. So if it doesn't use spent gasses I'd guess it's ok.
- Dave
Brian Mason- Posts : 51
Join date : 2011-06-12
Location : CA
Re: The Updated Rules
Similar to my comment/question on the ammunition side of the rules change, why does the CMP put limits on the type of guns used and how do they decide which ones are allowed. Is it just arbitrary? They apparently allow the Browning Hi-Power but not a 1911 9mm? I don't get it.
beeser- Posts : 1154
Join date : 2014-06-19
Re: The Updated Rules
Beeser,
The 9mm 1911 has never been used by our military as a service pistol. All the other pistols on the list have been used by some military as a service pistol. It's not an arbitrary thing.
Len
The 9mm 1911 has never been used by our military as a service pistol. All the other pistols on the list have been used by some military as a service pistol. It's not an arbitrary thing.
Len
LenV- Posts : 4769
Join date : 2014-01-24
Age : 74
Location : Oregon
Re: The Updated Rules
All of the pistols listed on pgs. 35-37 have been used by our military? I didn't know that.OldMaster64 wrote:Beeser,
The 9mm 1911 has never been used by our military as a service pistol. All the other pistols on the list have been used by some military as a service pistol. It's not an arbitrary thing.
Len
beeser- Posts : 1154
Join date : 2014-06-19
Re: The Updated Rules
beeser wrote:All of the pistols listed on pgs. 35-37 have been used by our military? I didn't know that.OldMaster64 wrote:Beeser,
The 9mm 1911 has never been used by our military as a service pistol. All the other pistols on the list have been used by some military as a service pistol. It's not an arbitrary thing.
Len
Beeser;
By SOME military.
Not OUR military.
Clarence
C.Perkins- Posts : 742
Join date : 2011-06-13
Age : 61
Location : Surrounded by pines in Wi.
Re: The Updated Rules
so can i use my pardini? i don't know how that thing works ......just know how to make it go bang.
gitkrunk- Posts : 163
Join date : 2013-01-01
Age : 38
Location : Anchorage,AK
Re: The Updated Rules
I'd bet that many of the approved other service pistols have never been used by any militaries. They might have been used by police forces, and it is arbitrary.
It's all about civilian marksmanship. It should be open to civilian, defensive guns capable of safely firing within the time limits.
It's all about civilian marksmanship. It should be open to civilian, defensive guns capable of safely firing within the time limits.
Last edited by DeweyHales on 1/7/2015, 7:46 pm; edited 1 time in total
DeweyHales- Posts : 641
Join date : 2011-06-10
Location : North Carolina
Re: The Updated Rules
Hmmmmm....OldMaster64 wrote:Beeser,
The 9mm 1911 has never been used by our military as a service pistol. All the other pistols on the list have been used by some military as a service pistol. It's not an arbitrary thing.
Len
Brazilian Military 1911 in 9mm
james r chapman- Admin
- Posts : 6372
Join date : 2012-01-31
Age : 75
Location : HELL, Michigan
Re: The Updated Rules
The neat thing about the new rules is the open end on pistols that are allowed. If you can make a case for any pistol all you have to do is send them the info. They will keep an updated list of current and new approved pistols on their site. Well that is what it says anyhow. I couldn't think of any military anywhere using a 952 but I will keep looking.
LenV- Posts : 4769
Join date : 2014-01-24
Age : 74
Location : Oregon
Re: The Updated Rules
Or the Argentine variant of the 1911 in .22lr ...
http://www.militaryfactory.com/smallarms/detail.asp?smallarms_id=93
I'll ask again, why do they have these (goofy) rules? What is the CMP trying to accomplish?
http://www.militaryfactory.com/smallarms/detail.asp?smallarms_id=93
I'll ask again, why do they have these (goofy) rules? What is the CMP trying to accomplish?
beeser- Posts : 1154
Join date : 2014-06-19
Re: The Updated Rules
They are trying to accomplish a broader list of firearms that can be used for the service pistol match without making it a free-for-all. They also intended for the .45 1911 to be competitive with the 9mm Beretta. It also appears that they wanted to ensure the .45acp 1911 and 9mm Beretta did not have a disadvantage against the new guns on the list.
Beeser, if they allow 1911s in other calibers, the .38spl and .38 Supers would dominate, and really those were never widely used service pistols. Accurate 50yd 9mm 1911s are hot rods and making it a free-for-all arms race isn't what CMP is trying to accomplish.
These rules were more thoughtful than others from the NRA. Try not to get too wrapped up in the why.
P.S. the Argentine Ballester-Molina .22lr wasn't a service pistol. The High Standard military was used by the military for training purposes but that isn't a "service pistol" either.
I would like to see these rules in effect for a while then see how the participation numbers look before we get too bent out of shape about what should be changed.
Beeser, if they allow 1911s in other calibers, the .38spl and .38 Supers would dominate, and really those were never widely used service pistols. Accurate 50yd 9mm 1911s are hot rods and making it a free-for-all arms race isn't what CMP is trying to accomplish.
These rules were more thoughtful than others from the NRA. Try not to get too wrapped up in the why.
P.S. the Argentine Ballester-Molina .22lr wasn't a service pistol. The High Standard military was used by the military for training purposes but that isn't a "service pistol" either.
I would like to see these rules in effect for a while then see how the participation numbers look before we get too bent out of shape about what should be changed.
Rob Kovach- Admin
- Posts : 2692
Join date : 2011-06-13
Age : 51
Location : Brooklyn, WI
Re: The Updated Rules
They can change rules all day long. But they can not change people to want to travel 2-3 hours to shoot 30 shots. Or to dedicate 5 hours a week for training and dryfire. Most 30 shot events will coincide with 270 shot events. Not to mention the special dedication for traveling 3000 miles to Perry. I am not holding my breath for a lot of increase in participants.
Someone had to say it.
Someone had to say it.
Jack H- Posts : 2699
Join date : 2011-06-10
Age : 75
Location : Oregon
Re: The Updated Rules
Well, it might get me travel from s.e. Michigan!
head towards Davis-Bessie and turn right?
head towards Davis-Bessie and turn right?
james r chapman- Admin
- Posts : 6372
Join date : 2012-01-31
Age : 75
Location : HELL, Michigan
Re: The Updated Rules
Want to put money on that? I predict over 10% increase in reported scores for .22 EIC and Service Pistol over 2014s reported scores.Jack H wrote:I am not holding my breath for a lot of increase in participants.
Rob Kovach- Admin
- Posts : 2692
Join date : 2011-06-13
Age : 51
Location : Brooklyn, WI
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Travel Case - Updated
» High Standard new X-Series guns
» Comps on 22 pistols
» My Rock River Arms Story - UPDATED!
» When am I going to see these lists updated?
» High Standard new X-Series guns
» Comps on 22 pistols
» My Rock River Arms Story - UPDATED!
» When am I going to see these lists updated?
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum