Loading Hi-tek coated bullets versus conventional waxed or tumble lube.
+4
AllAces
Lightfoot
jglenn21
zanemoseley
8 posters
Page 1 of 1
Loading Hi-tek coated bullets versus conventional waxed or tumble lube.
I just got a case of the 160 grain bullets with Hi-tek coating. I've loaded the same bullet in both tumble lube and standard wax with the same powder drop. Will I have to adjust my drop for Hi-tek?
zanemoseley- Posts : 2687
Join date : 2015-07-11
Location : Cookeville, TN
Re: Loading Hi-tek coated bullets versus conventional waxed or tumble lube.
I load Hi-tek and std lubes the exact same way.
jglenn21- Posts : 2618
Join date : 2015-04-07
Age : 76
Location : monroe , ga
Re: Loading Hi-tek coated bullets versus conventional waxed or tumble lube.
Zane, Try them the same way first. On occasion an additional 1/10th might be needed but probably not. I load those at 3.7 bullseye with great results in my frame mount and open sighted guns. Nice and soft. Shot a 99-7x last week too with them.
Lightfoot- Posts : 230
Join date : 2016-08-07
Location : Aggieland TX
Re: Loading Hi-tek coated bullets versus conventional waxed or tumble lube.
I've loaded several different brands of coated .45's, mostly 185 and 200 gr SWC, and some double ended 148 gr .38's. Loaded on same press with same settings as for uncoated lead. I tested using a ransom rest, but could get none of them to group as well as uncoated lead.
AllAces- Posts : 745
Join date : 2011-08-30
Re: Loading Hi-tek coated bullets versus conventional waxed or tumble lube.
Thanks guys, I'll try my standard load. What I'm hoping is that I can use them indoors for less smoke. My local indoor range doesn't have good enough ventilation to allow me to shoot 45 waxed loads.
zanemoseley- Posts : 2687
Join date : 2015-07-11
Location : Cookeville, TN
Re: Loading Hi-tek coated bullets versus conventional waxed or tumble lube.
AllAces wrote:I've loaded several different brands of coated .45's, mostly 185 and 200 gr SWC, and some double ended 148 gr .38's. Loaded on same press with same settings as for uncoated lead. I tested using a ransom rest, but could get none of them to group as well as uncoated lead.
Try some Brazos Bullets coated. We still have more testing to do, but all initial tests show no difference in group size.
Lightfoot- Posts : 230
Join date : 2016-08-07
Location : Aggieland TX
Re: Loading Hi-tek coated bullets versus conventional waxed or tumble lube.
Getting excellent groups with Brazos. One gun gets under 2" @ 50 yards for 5 shots hand held on a Hyscore pistol rest.
I was a bullet caster for years. Then in 2006, I had high lead levels. Now I purchase coated. Less smoke indoors and outdoors.
David
I was a bullet caster for years. Then in 2006, I had high lead levels. Now I purchase coated. Less smoke indoors and outdoors.
David
David R- Posts : 408
Join date : 2018-12-10
Age : 64
Location : Hamlin NY
Re: Loading Hi-tek coated bullets versus conventional waxed or tumble lube.
Brazos 160 is the same bullet that was cast by Dardas and is cast by Bob's Bullets from the Magma Engineering mold. I do not know about others coated bullets but Brazos 160s with their HiTek coating group exactly the same as the lubed 160s from the Magma mold loaded exactly the same as the regular 160's. A very accurate tight grouping bullet profile at 50yds when cast properly and loaded properly.
farmboy- Posts : 295
Join date : 2012-10-04
Location : Wichita, KS
Re: Loading Hi-tek coated bullets versus conventional waxed or tumble lube.
What was the crimp setting? Another post recommended .463. I normally use a .469 crimp. Thanks
kohlerpartsgod- Posts : 91
Join date : 2014-04-24
Location : Phoenix
Re: Loading Hi-tek coated bullets versus conventional waxed or tumble lube.
.463-.464 is what I use for 160s - it is the only bullet I crimp that tightkohlerpartsgod wrote:What was the crimp setting? Another post recommended .463. I normally use a .469 crimp. Thanks
farmboy- Posts : 295
Join date : 2012-10-04
Location : Wichita, KS
Re: Loading Hi-tek coated bullets versus conventional waxed or tumble lube.
Well I loaded them same as waxed, 4.6 WST at .463" crimp. Shot just fine. Got about 2500 to play with now.
zanemoseley- Posts : 2687
Join date : 2015-07-11
Location : Cookeville, TN
Re: Loading Hi-tek coated bullets versus conventional waxed or tumble lube.
I wonder if you have any chrono data for that load or others? What recoil spring weight did you use?Lightfoot wrote:Zane, Try them the same way first. On occasion an additional 1/10th might be needed but probably not. I load those at 3.7 bullseye with great results in my frame mount and open sighted guns. Nice and soft. Shot a 99-7x last week too with them.
Used a Shooting Chrony at 15 feet.
Below was with 180 gr SWC Flat Base with a bhn 13 and Hi Tek coating Crimp .464-.466
My data from last Saturday with 3.7 gr avg 702 fps and 4.0 gr. avg 724 fps
Looking to run about 750 fps if I load 4.5
PS I like the Hi Tek and flat base bullet.
GerhardG- Posts : 88
Join date : 2018-07-30
Age : 70
Re: Loading Hi-tek coated bullets versus conventional waxed or tumble lube.
That seems like a pretty hot loadzanemoseley wrote:Well I loaded them same as waxed, 4.6 WST at .463" crimp. Shot just fine. Got about 2500 to play with now.
farmboy- Posts : 295
Join date : 2012-10-04
Location : Wichita, KS
Similar topics
» Tumble Lube versus Lube Sizer
» Loading Coated Bullets In 45 ACP
» Any one trying coated bullets in .38 special, specifically in auto-loading pistols? If so, what is your load and the pistol used?
» Lee Tumble Lube Thoughts Please
» Bullet lube -tumble, pan, or Lubrisizer ?
» Loading Coated Bullets In 45 ACP
» Any one trying coated bullets in .38 special, specifically in auto-loading pistols? If so, what is your load and the pistol used?
» Lee Tumble Lube Thoughts Please
» Bullet lube -tumble, pan, or Lubrisizer ?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|